CoQ10 (Ubiquinone) vs Ubiquinol: Absorption Studies
[Supplements · Comparison]

CoQ10 vs ubiquinol: is the reduced form better absorbed?

Absorption · Trials · Safety · Industry ties

Short answer: Ubiquinone is the standard form of CoQ10; ubiquinol is the reduced form. In a head-to-head study in 21 older adults, ubiquinol was not significantly better absorbed than ubiquinone, and either way CoQ10 showed up in the blood mostly as ubiquinol.1 Most trials used standard CoQ10. NIH says the evidence for heart and statin-pain uses is inconclusive or negative.2

How do ubiquinone and ubiquinol compare side by side?

From NCCIH and the human trials cited. Amounts are study protocols, not advice.
Ubiquinone (standard CoQ10)Ubiquinol
What it isThe oxidised form; used in most CoQ10 studies3The reduced form3
Absorption, head to headReference product in a 3-way crossover of 100 mg single doses11.7 times the reference, not statistically significant1
Form found in the bloodMostly ubiquinol, even when taken as ubiquinone1Mostly ubiquinol1
Larger trialsHeart failure: 420 people, 100 mg 3 times a day for 2 years; fewer major heart events454 active men, 300 mg a day for 6 weeks; no change in exercise capacity3
SafetyNo serious side effects reported; may interact with warfarin and insulin2No safety concerns up to 300 mg a day for 4 weeks in the maker's study5

Reviewed . Half-life figures are shown only where the value Dose Track uses agrees with the cited source.

Is ubiquinol better absorbed?

In a randomized crossover study, 21 healthy adults aged 65 to 74 took single 100 mg doses of a water-soluble CoQ10, ubiquinol capsules, and standard ubiquinone capsules a week apart. Ubiquinol was 1.7 times the ubiquinone level over 48 hours, but this was not statistically significant; the water-soluble product was 2.4 times. All three showed up in the blood mostly as ubiquinol.1

The first human study of ubiquinol, by Kaneka (the maker), found it was absorbed and caused no safety concerns at up to 300 mg a day for 4 weeks.5

What did the outcome trials find?

The Q-SYMBIO trial gave 420 people with moderate to severe heart failure 100 mg of CoQ10 3 times a day or placebo for 2 years. Short-term measures did not change, but major heart events were lower (15% vs 26%). The abstract does not name the form.4 NCCIH calls the heart failure evidence inconclusive overall and says the evidence does not support CoQ10 for statin muscle pain.2

In 54 healthy, active men, 300 mg a day of ubiquinol for 6 weeks raised blood CoQ10 and one measure of mitochondrial efficiency, but did not change time to exhaustion. Kaneka co-funded the work.3

So which one?

The one head-to-head absorption study found no significant edge for ubiquinol, and the body converts most of either form to ubiquinol. No trial has compared the two on a health outcome. This is general information, not personal advice. More detail: the Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) guide.

This page summarizes labels and published studies. It is not personalized medical advice; confirm any dose or change with your prescriber.

Frequently asked questions

Is ubiquinol better than CoQ10?+
In a head-to-head study in 21 older adults, ubiquinol was not significantly better absorbed than standard CoQ10 (ubiquinone).1
Does the body turn ubiquinone into ubiquinol?+
In that study, CoQ10 showed up in the blood mostly as ubiquinol even when taken as ubiquinone.1
Does CoQ10 interact with medicines?+
NCCIH says CoQ10 may interact with warfarin and insulin.2
Can I track CoQ10 in Dose Track?+
Yes. Log either form with milligrams and reminders, and add notes.